|
In October 1954 Leo Sowerby received a hastily penned note from his good
friend and fellow composer, Samuel Barber: "[Fritz] Reiner is doing a big chorus number
of mine in March in Chicago and I wish I knew how to write for choir the way you do, damn
it; so please come and help me to correct the mistakes!" Sowerby (1895-1968) had written
the first of his nearly 200 choral scores at the age of fifteen, and his final composition,
when he was seventy-three, was an anthem for choir. Forsaken of Man (1939) thus stands
near the midpoint of his career.
On an afternoon early in February 1935, Leo Sowerby had just finished practicing for an organ
recital he was about to give at the University of Chicago's Rockefeller Chapel, when Edward
Borgers, a 19-year-old junior at the University, approached, asking the composer to look at
an opera libretto he had written. "I never write opera," Sowerby said, with his characteristic
brusqueness. Nevertheless, he thrust the manuscript into his briefcase. This was the inauspicious
beginning of a friendship that eventually produced two cantatas, Forsaken of Man (1939)
and Christ Reborn (1950).
Late in 1938 Sowerby suggested to Borgers that they collaborate on a cantata for performance
on Good Friday. By that time, Borgers had completed degrees in both music and English, with a
special interest in drama. The two men worked out the cantata together, although Borgers was
by then teaching in northern Michigan, while Sowerby continued to work in Chicago.
The libretto of Forsaken of Man generally follows the Gospel of Matthew's account,
but with liberal insertions from the other three Gospels. Dr. Borgers chose the selections
from the Gospels, and then wrote the chorus's role, as commentary on the story.
Forsaken of Man is divided into four parts, with a brief Prologue and Epilogue.
Although this is unusual for a cantata, the form has precedent in both drama and opera.
In all four parts, which are approximately equal in length, the title of the work is
the governing motive. In Part I, the disciples implicitly forsake Jesus, in their
failure to understand his teachings. In Parts II and III, Jesus is rejected first by
Judas, then by Peter and the other disciples. Finally, in Part IV, "all the people"
turn against Jesus as he is brought before them by Pilate and led off to be crucified.
The climax of Part IV and the entire cantata evoke the ultimate despair in Jesus's final
cry from the cross: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"
Sowerby's music underscores the painful progression from misunderstanding to actual
desertion by one traitorous disciple, the group of trusted disciples, the masses and,
as it seemed in the agony of the crucifixion, possibly even by God.
The Prologue remains solidly in the key of D minor, despite the use of chromaticism.
Part I progresses through several related keys by way of orderly modulations. In the next
two parts the modulations are increasingly adventurous, and travel to more distant keys.
Key signatures are omitted entirely in Part IV, and there are sections of tonal ambiguity.
Only at Jesus's final cry, however, is tonality itself abandoned. After a dramatic pause,
it is restored in the Epilogue.
The dramatic story is propelled by the Evangelist, a role given to a tenor (as in J.S.
Bach's St. Matthew and St. John Passions). The Evangelist stands outside the action,
narrating in the past tense, mostly in a declamatory, recitative style. The action
itself is in the present tense, and is carried mainly by seven soloists, each playing
the role of a specific character in the Biblical accounts. Of these, the major role by
far is that of Jesus, assigned to a baritone (again paralleling Bach's Passions).
The chorus has a twofold role: Within the action it is called upon for various group
scenes - an argument among the disciples; a council of priests and Pharisees; and the
mob at Jesus's trial and crucifixion. The chorus also stands outside the action; in words
created by the librettist, it reflects on the larger meaning of the events taking place
and, by implication, invites the listener to do so. The Epilogue involves the listener
directly, as the chorus asks three questions. A quiet organ coda continues the minor mode
of the Epilogue, as if awaiting a response. Only in the final measure is there a glimmer
of hope, as the work is allowed slowly to resolve to a major chord.
As is characteristic of Sowerby's choral compositions, the music of Forsaken of Man
is always subordinate to the text. Phrase structures, melodic lines, harmonic progressions and
larger formal considerations all serve the libretto. Imitative counterpoint is introduced to
dramatize the text, for example, in the strict canon written for the argument among the disciples
in Part I and the canonic murmuring of the disciples ("Lord, is it I?") in Part II.
The most conspicuous features of Sowerby's music are his singular harmonic structures and
progressions, even while remaining within the bounds of tonality. Sowerby's natural musical
language is counterpoint, but the voice-leading of the individual horizontal melodic lines
is not adjusted in order to produce traditional vertical harmonies. Chordal structures follow
one another in a manner that defies easy analysis. Yet one familiar with his writing can hear
that the seemingly discordant notes are in fact resolved in their individual melodic lines,
although those resolutions may be greatly delayed.
Forsaken of Man received two simultaneous first performances on Good Friday evening,
March 22, 1940. One was at St. James' Episcopal Church in Chicago, with Leo Sowerby as
organist-choirmaster, and the other in that city's Hyde Park Methodist Church, under the
direction of Mrs. Mary Ruth Craven. The work is dedicated to the Right Reverend George
Craig Stewart, then Episcopal Bishop of Chicago and long-time friend of the composer.
- Ronald M. Huntington
The late Ronald M. Huntington was Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Chapman College
and an organist-choirmaster. Generally acknowledged to be the preeminent Sowerby scholar,
at the time of his death he was working on expanding his 1952 Master's thesis on Sowerby
into the first critical biography of the composer.
|